An evidence-led diagnostic
A review of response status, crawling controls, canonical signals, page rendering, sitemaps and key internal paths.
INDEPENDENT B2B SEARCH CONSULTING
I investigate whether search engines can access, understand and select the pages that matter to your business. Get a prioritized technical backlog with evidence and acceptance criteria for the people implementing the work.
WHO THIS IS FOR
This fits a marketing or engineering team facing unexplained indexing changes, an expanding website, a recent release or a backlog of contradictory audit exports. It is useful when you need to know which technical findings are real and what a developer should verify.
SEO audit services diagnose technical conditions that affect a website’s search accessibility and page selection. This technical SEO audit service concentrates on crawlability, indexing, rendering, internal links and implementation priorities rather than producing a long list of tool warnings.
A crawler warning is not automatically a defect, and an indexable URL is not automatically a useful search destination. Treating every warning as equally urgent can consume development time while an important template or access problem remains unresolved.
01 / THE TAKEAWAYS
A review of response status, crawling controls, canonical signals, page rendering, sitemaps and key internal paths.
Each material finding has affected examples, an explanation, an owner and a suggested sequence for addressing dependencies.
Practical checks for confirming a proposed fix without claiming that a successful release guarantees a ranking improvement.
I begin with important page types and the paths through which people and crawlers reach them. A failure affecting a whole product template deserves a different response from an isolated broken link. Findings are grouped by consequence, scope and implementation dependencies. I record examples that another person can inspect, so your developer does not have to reconstruct a problem from a colored score. The aim is a useful technical decision, including which warnings can be postponed or dismissed after review.
The review distinguishes whether a URL can be requested, whether its response is suitable and whether its signals support the intended indexable page. I inspect robots directives, response codes, canonical declarations and sitemap membership together. Duplicate or parameterized URLs may be intentional; the audit should understand their role before recommending redirects or blocks. Where Search Console access is available, its observations can help identify affected patterns. It remains important to inspect real examples rather than treating an export as a complete explanation.
I compare the initial HTML response with the content available after rendering where JavaScript affects important page elements. Titles, canonical information, headings, content and links should have a clear delivery path. A technically accessible shell can still omit the information a buyer needs. I review representative templates, including important product or service pages, rather than testing one convenient homepage. The resulting recommendation identifies whether the issue belongs in server rendering, template logic, CMS fields or another implementation layer your team can actually change.
Technical SEO consulting includes understanding how useful pages are connected. I check whether important destinations can be discovered through normal links, whether retired URLs remain prominent and whether pagination or filters create confusing paths. The audit distinguishes navigation problems from content decisions that require a broader commercial review. If the main issue is buyer coverage, keyword ownership or conversion paths, the separate B2B and SaaS audit is a better fit. That prevents a technical report from making unsupported editorial recommendations outside its agreed evidence.
Every significant ticket should explain the current behavior, the intended behavior and how to test the change. I identify dependencies, such as fixing a template before republishing individual pages, and separate one-time corrections from recurring quality checks. An enterprise SEO audit can require wider sampling and coordination than a smaller site, so the size and template complexity are agreed before work begins. After delivery, your team should be able to assign the work and ask precise questions, rather than translate a generic audit into its own specification.
02 / HOW WE START
Provide the website, recent releases, priority page types and available access. I identify the decisions the audit should support and the limits of the evidence available without production or analytics access.
We confirm the approximate page count, representative templates and implementation stakeholders. The scope states which technical checks are included and whether a wider commercial audit is needed instead.
I walk through material findings, proposed acceptance criteria and dependencies. Your team leaves with a sequence for implementation and a clear distinction between a completed fix and a later search outcome.
EVIDENCE AND APPROACH
The published Uptech case documents SEO and content consulting, editorial planning and blog-migration support. Its historical organic-user growth provides engagement context, not a claim that a technical audit alone generated the result.
Read the Uptech case study ↗SCOPE AND PRICING
TECHNICAL SEO AUDIT
Starting from$900per audit
Sites up to approximately 500 pages. Larger sites are quoted after discovery.
Final scope depends on site size, access, specialist review and who implements the work. Paid tools, development and writing volume are included only when the proposal says so.
The technical audit starts from $900 per audit for sites up to approximately 500 pages. It covers an agreed technical sample and a prioritized implementation backlog. Larger sites, complex templates or additional review requirements are quoted after discovery. The proposal also explains access needs, exclusions and whether implementation or a later verification pass is included in the agreed work.
This service concentrates on technical accessibility, indexing signals, rendering and implementation requirements. The B2B and SaaS audit also examines keyword and content coverage, the buyer journey and conversion paths. I recommend the scope that matches the decision you need to make. Choosing a wider audit is useful when a technically healthy website still attracts the wrong visitors or provides a weak commercial next step.
Implementation is included only when the written scope says so. The audit provides findings and acceptance criteria that your developer can use, and the proposal names the owner of the actual changes. If ongoing technical SEO consulting or additional verification is needed, we define that work separately. A report should not leave your team guessing whether an important fix has an accountable implementer.
An audit cannot guarantee rankings or a particular amount of traffic. It can identify verified problems, explain their significance and provide a practical implementation plan. Search outcomes depend on competition, content, execution and systems outside the audit itself. I separate checks that confirm a technical change from later observations that may indicate a broader improvement in search performance.
YOUR NEXT MOVE
Bring a search challenge. We’ll work out where to start.